Holtby had a chance on Flyers goals 1, 3, 4, & 5. 2, 6, & 7 were tough ones. He should have stopped some of those. There was really only one series where he made notably good saves.
Goal 4 was particularly bad because he actually stopped it and let it bounce through/under his arm.
The entire team played like shit and did hang him out to dry on a few goals. That doesn't mean 7 is acceptable.
Were 2, 6, and 7 the 2 one-timers (one cross crease and the other from behind the net) and the breakaway? Because if so I agree. There were a couple of deflection goals and a couple of wrist shot goals where I felt like a GOOD goalie could get some of them.
Again, LOSS isn't on Holts, but a good goalie doesn't give up a touchdown. A good goalie keeps the game within reach in case we want to mount a heroic comeback.
EDIT:
Looked at replays, I think 4, 5, 6 he should have gotten.
4 - The floater from the blue line that was deflected in. Holts was just leaky there.
5 - Turnover that led to a wrist shot from the Ovi spot. A good glove hand should have had that.
6 - The reason why I thought 6 he had a chance on was because the guy who tipped it WASN'T the guy on the far side of the net, he was the guy on the short side, and that tip was saveable with good positioning IMO.
The remaining four "tougher" goals were the 3 one-timers from close up and the breakaway goal. I still think a goalie who is zoned in could get at least one of those, but those are some goals that admittedly I wouldn't have expected Holts to get. The other three though? Could have had them. Could have been a 4-2 or 3-2 game.