YOURE DAMN RIGHT!!!
Let us also not forget the a big part of this core is now locked into long term, high dollar contracts to.
Yeah it's why I'd rather just they suck it up and go for it with some of the core. Carlson is due a huge FA bump and is high trade value, he could go. Burt, Vrana, Connolly, we have players who are a bit younger that teams could be interested in. Not even just this season for the future, obviously if we rebuild you have to ask yourself what happens with Ovechkin, Backstrom etc. But I'd still rather see them get Nisky someone to play on a real top pairing and then shore up some grit/depth/leadership everywhere else.
I realize some might argue that you would be a fool to trade some of our younger players when we have no idea if we are going to win or not. But that is part and parcel to a huge problem with ours and has been. For as much as the management always says they go for it, do they really? Even the Shattenkirk deal last season, our GM's want to be lauded for being smart, and savvy, they always have. They focus so much on this long term game that micromanaging valuable prospects, making sure build valuable depth and the like that not enough focus is spent on what the team is doing now, what it's identity is now. If you were to look at our roster as a hole, what are we?
Are we competitors? I mean, I guess, Oshie, Ovie, Nicky, Kuzy, Holtby, the number of top NHL players on our roster is high, we win games, we score goals, we are a playoff team. But our farm team and depth is some of the youngest unready NHL talent your ever going to see. Those are traits not of an NHL contender. They are traits of teams like Arizona, of rebuilders. I said it before but far too often when it comes to the roster we ice we end up taking steps back everytime we take steps forward. We'll fix an issue like 2C with Kuzy coming into town, and then lose the depth pieces that helped keep us above the board with names like Ward/Chimera.