Talk about Capitals hockey & more! > Washington Capitals & Other Hockey Discussion

Trade Deadline Updates,Rumors and laugh at Eklund

<< < (26/48) > >>

DC_1908:

--- Quote from: Maacoshark on Sunday February 25, 2018, 10:21:26 AM Eastern ---   I dont care about Nash. Big time playoff underachiever. I'm still hoping we pick up a real dman. We can go with what we have upfront. Although I wouldn't have a problem with adding va power forward.

--- End quote ---
I’m more concerned about how much better the Bruins just got.  They now have another huge 200ft player on a roster full of em.


I too wouldn’t mind a power forward,  it what seems to be the most logical would be a player from the Beagle-mold that can help with face-offs, shut down, PK and play all 3 forwards. . . That could take pressure from the DCorps and reduce the liabilities from Connolly, Bura, Kuzy, Varna and others. . .but,it’s The Caps so it’s doubtful either will happen  :rofl:

Beaglefan2:
I don’t care about Nash either. For some reason, we own the Bruins. My ideal scenario is we trade Carlson for two number ones and a prospect, but that ain’t happening. I just hope we don’t do something stupid.... again.

Maacoshark:

--- Quote from: Beaglefan2 on Sunday February 25, 2018, 06:00:48 PM Eastern ---I don’t care about Nash either. For some reason, we own the Bruins. My ideal scenario is we trade Carlson for two number ones and a prospect, but that ain’t happening. I just hope we don’t do something stupid.... again.

--- End quote ---
  We aren't really in a position to trade Carlson unless we get a dman back. Still not sure why you guys are hating in him so much. He has been our best dman and it isn't even close. Mind you our dcore has sucked this year.

Mickstix:


--- Quote from: Maacoshark on Sunday February 25, 2018, 06:11:33 PM Eastern ---  We aren't really in a position to trade Carlson unless we get a dman back. Still not sure why you guys are hating in him so much.

--- End quote ---


Becaaaaause..
A. He costs too much
B. He's going to walk for nothing at the end of the year
C. We're not winning a cup w/ or w/o him..
D. All of the above.
 :wackysmile:

Maacoshark:

--- Quote from: Mickstix on Sunday February 25, 2018, 07:28:17 PM Eastern ---
Becaaaaause..
A. He costs too much
B. He's going to walk for nothing at the end of the year
C. We're not winning a cup w/ or w/o him..
D. All of the above.
 :wackysmile:

--- End quote ---
   We dont know what he will sign for and we dont know if he is going to walk. Im OK with trading him if we get something decent in return. If we weren't going to make the playoffs trading him would be a no brainer.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version