Author Topic: Coaching  (Read 10013 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online alta

  • I don't swing that way
  • Global Moderator
  • Hockey Deity
  • ******
  • Posts: 21563
  • Likes: 2388
  • just say no, to socialism
Re: Coaching
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday February 25, 2020, 04:56:51 PM Eastern »
I admit freely that I have never looked at a Bull's asshole  :)


you've obviously never spent any time in a barnyard
Knowledge is knowing that the Tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is knowing that you shouldn't include it in a Fruit Salad; Philosophy is wondering if a Bloody Mary counts as smoothie

"Oh bother" said Poo, as he chambered another round

Offline PUCKNRUSH

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
  • Likes: 230
Re: Coaching
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday February 25, 2020, 07:41:51 PM Eastern »
I admit freely that I have never looked at a Bull's asshole  :)


LMFAO, Rich!!😂🤣😂
I confess.
I believe I was around 19 or 20 yrs old.  Don’t really remember how me and few buddies wound up walking through a cow pasture! (Could be that we were all a bit “micro dotted”, at the time!😆


My buddy had a flashlight, and in near complete darkness we heard a big long SPLAT_SPLAT!!
He swung the flashlight beam over to the sound and...WHOA MOMMA!!
(Yeah we saw it)!😂🤣😂


Rush
Always hopeful, yet discontent -
He knows CHANGES aren’t permanent -
              BUT CHANGE IS!!!

RUSH - from “Tom Sawyer”

Offline richkrt99

  • Oh, I'm the Hillbilly alrighty!
  • Hockey Deity
  • ******
  • Posts: 7004
  • Likes: 880
  • Bigger than yours!
Re: Coaching
« Reply #22 on: Friday February 28, 2020, 11:45:24 AM Eastern »

For Lil's sake, I have reposted this in the "proper" thread....



You guys are all high and living in Fantasy Land if you think TR will be fired this season/


What viable reason would you give for firing?  Stating "because he sucks" is not a viable reason.
What grounds do you have for firing the guy?  Because the Caps are in lowly 1st place in the division?  Because they are only 3rd in the entire NHL?
Oh, maybe because our superstar Ovi is struggling mightily with this system and can't score goals and draw in fans anymore?
You don't fire a guy cause he's tall and goofy and the board fans don't like him.  If there was a team dynamic that caused the players to turn on him, then okay, but that has NOT happened with this team.


I don't believe TR is a great coach.  I never liked the choice, but understand the process and commitment the team made to him.
Having said that, there's no way they fire him at this point in the season based on the level of success (more importantly standings points) the team has this year.
The caps have 18 games left.  What veteran coach would want to come in at this point to a team that fired a head coach that was in 1st place?  What effective changes could he make with essentially 4 weeks left in the season?  Not saying it isn't possible, but it won't happen.


For better or worse, the Caps are committed to the horse they rode in on at this point.


I doubt very much the Caps would even fire TR after we fail to progress in the playoffs (again).
FFS - HIT HIM!!!
SHOOT - THE - PUCK

Offline Mickstix

  • Wait, Im the Redneck? Damn right! Fish on!
  • Hockey Deity
  • ******
  • Posts: 19030
  • Likes: 1737
  • Fish On!
Re: Coaching
« Reply #23 on: Friday February 28, 2020, 01:05:45 PM Eastern »
Ship has sailed on a new HC this year. But if they continue to look lethargic, get bounced early in the playoffs, he'll probably be replaced in the offseason. I don't know if it's the system or what, but they just don't respond to TR.. This team looks vastly different, in the way it looses, compared to past year slumps. This team never has energy, doesn't forecheck, rarely hits, have terrible (repeated) breakdowns in their own end, has a stagnant PP that never evolves past putting different bodies in the same spots, etc..


No creativity going on, just hope the stretch pass connects a couple times a game and maybe Ovie beats a goalie with a 1 timer.. Pretty much all they have to offer. Hard work is a double four letter word with this group. Coaching could probably change that, for at least a little while. But starting off with a pond hockey system, that has early (division leading) success, then expecting them to turn up the work ethic and start playing responsible is a pipe dream for this group, coming from a bozo coach.. Just is what it is.

KollieOlizig

  • Guest
Re: Coaching
« Reply #24 on: Friday February 28, 2020, 06:27:13 PM Eastern »
Ship has sailed on a new HC this year. But if they continue to look lethargic, get bounced early in the playoffs, he'll probably be replaced in the offseason. I don't know if it's the system or what, but they just don't respond to TR.. This team looks vastly different, in the way it looses, compared to past year slumps. This team never has energy, doesn't forecheck, rarely hits, have terrible (repeated) breakdowns in their own end, has a stagnant PP that never evolves past putting different bodies in the same spots, etc..


No creativity going on, just hope the stretch pass connects a couple times a game and maybe Ovie beats a goalie with a 1 timer.. Pretty much all they have to offer. Hard work is a double four letter word with this group. Coaching could probably change that, for at least a little while. But starting off with a pond hockey system, that has early (division leading) success, then expecting them to turn up the work ethic and start playing responsible is a pipe dream for this group, coming from a bozo coach.. Just is what it is.
     You mentioned our stagnant pp. It has obviously been a huge concern. Early on the PP was going well but teams adjusted and the unit has become mediocre. Reirden tried a few different looks but without much success.
     They tried using Vrana on the top unit over Kuzy. That didn't really work. They have had Ovi and Carlson switch sides with limited success. The most successful unit in recent games was putting Wilson in over Kuzy or Vrana and causing havoc in front of the net. It was more of an old school type of pp. Lastnight they went back to Vrana on the top unit and it just doesn't work on a consistent basis. Vrana just isn't good enough at retrieving pucks. And he is way too soft to be a presence in front of the net.
     They have also been messing with Kovalchuk on the PP.  Trying him in different spots.
I like the first unit of Ovi, Backstrom, Carlson, Oshie and Wilson. And if they want to change it up they could put in Kuzy over Wilson, which was the first unit to start the season. The 2nd unit I'd go with Ovi, Orlov, Kuzy, Eller and Kovalchuk. I wouldn't use Vrana on the PP at all.
     What do you guys think?

Offline Mickstix

  • Wait, Im the Redneck? Damn right! Fish on!
  • Hockey Deity
  • ******
  • Posts: 19030
  • Likes: 1737
  • Fish On!
Re: Coaching
« Reply #25 on: Friday February 28, 2020, 07:13:57 PM Eastern »
The "unit" isn't my concern so much, it's how they go about executing it. It's the exact same look, just different bodies. As you said, teams have adjusted. If Ovie isn't pin point accurate, it's just a crap shoot system with Oshie getting the -random- look from the middle or Carlson getting a deflection from the point. I'd like to see some actual movement, rotation, etc. "Something" that's actually different then just 5 guys standing in the same spots, passing the puck back and forth until they get challenged and cough it up. Zone entries and faceoff losses are another concern they've not addressed.

KollieOlizig

  • Guest
Re: Coaching
« Reply #26 on: Saturday February 29, 2020, 08:30:42 AM Eastern »
The "unit" isn't my concern so much, it's how they go about executing it. It's the exact same look, just different bodies. As you said, teams have adjusted. If Ovie isn't pin point accurate, it's just a crap shoot system with Oshie getting the -random- look from the middle or Carlson getting a deflection from the point. I'd like to see some actual movement, rotation, etc. "Something" that's actually different then just 5 guys standing in the same spots, passing the puck back and forth until they get challenged and cough it up. Zone entries and faceoff losses are another concern they've not addressed.
      I agree that the PP has been the same look except when Wilson was on the top unit. It was an old school pp with a lot of traffic in front of the net. And it worked better than our usual setup.

Offline Mickstix

  • Wait, Im the Redneck? Damn right! Fish on!
  • Hockey Deity
  • ******
  • Posts: 19030
  • Likes: 1737
  • Fish On!
Re: Coaching
« Reply #27 on: Saturday February 29, 2020, 09:17:48 AM Eastern »
Yea, they're net shy as a team, unfortunately.. They can rarely be bothered to put on the brakes if they get near the net. Safest play is to skate by and hopefully not get checked.  :clown: :poop:

Offline waynerivers

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
  • Likes: 151
Re: Coaching
« Reply #28 on: Saturday February 29, 2020, 01:40:50 PM Eastern »
There have been a few grumbles of late regarding Reirdon.
There are a couple of people who blame the coach for everything, including the weather, but I think it's fair to say that the coaching needs to be assessed/examined. in light of our recent play, or lack thereof.

There has been a definite downturn in our team and for a while now.
We had a whole series of games where we played like crap, then put in an effort in the last twently minutes.... then ten minutes and then only five minutes.  lots of come from behinds ,that we really didn't deserve to win.
Now we've (RIGHTLY) stopped winning.
Is it the system?   That's down to the coaches.
Is iit the executiion?   That's down to the players.
Is it motivation?   Who's to blame for that?   50/50 imho.

What really concerns me right now is the lack of correcting the constant and repeat mistakes that are being made, over and over again.  The passing and giveaways are appalling.  The telegraphed stretch passes that a blind person can see.
Our face=offs are appalling.  WHAT is wrong wiith Nicky?
As for our D .......... :huh:    I say send them to Dale Hunter for a week...... :snicker:

WHY can't Reirdon address these glaringly obvious issues.   Has he lost the room?


The bolded above are ALL coaching.  Either Rierden doesn't see it or he can't make the players pay attention.  Either one is lethal.  The Caps were 24-10 on 12/16 and are 15-15 since.  That's 12 weeks of crap play that hasn't been corrected.

Offline PUCKNRUSH

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
  • Likes: 230
Re: Coaching
« Reply #29 on: Saturday February 29, 2020, 05:19:59 PM Eastern »
There have been a few grumbles of late regarding Reirdon.
There are a couple of people who blame the coach for everything, including the weather, but I think it's fair to say that the coaching needs to be assessed/examined. in light of our recent play, or lack thereof.

There has been a definite downturn in our team and for a while now.
We had a whole series of games where we played like crap, then put in an effort in the last twently minutes.... then ten minutes and then only five minutes.  lots of come from behinds ,that we really didn't deserve to win.
Now we've (RIGHTLY) stopped winning.
Is it the system?   That's down to the coaches.
Is iit the executiion?   That's down to the players.
Is it motivation?   Who's to blame for that?   50/50 imho.

What really concerns me right now is the lack of correcting the constant and repeat mistakes that are being made, over and over again.  The passing and giveaways are appalling.  The telegraphed stretch passes that a blind person can see.
Our face=offs are appalling.  WHAT is wrong wiith Nicky?
As for our D .......... :huh:    I say send them to Dale Hunter for a week...... :snicker:

WHY can't Reirdon address these glaringly obvious issues.   Has he lost the room?


Good thread, and good post Lil’!


 Having already given my opinion in this thread, I would like to pose a point on the last question of your post .....”Has he lost the room?”


Good question!
I would just add that “losing the room”, obviously implies that Rierden, at one point, HAD, the room in the first place!!


Well,  I don’t think he ever HAD the locker room, to begin with. Therefore, you can’t LOSE, what you never HAD!!


The Caps players, simply seem to deal with Rierden, like the expression that the old time, middle-aged, southern, African American, women used to use......”They don’t pay him no never mind”!😁😁


Rush
Always hopeful, yet discontent -
He knows CHANGES aren’t permanent -
              BUT CHANGE IS!!!

RUSH - from “Tom Sawyer”

Offline RavenCp

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3764
  • Likes: 224
Re: Coaching
« Reply #30 on: Monday March 02, 2020, 08:57:47 AM Eastern »
Just learned that VK fired Gallant this January, after four games loosing in a row. Quite bold. Is he already hired? Sorry, guys if it was already discussed!

Offline justwincaps

  • Advanced Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2587
  • Likes: 404
Re: Coaching
« Reply #31 on: Friday March 06, 2020, 11:41:53 AM Eastern »
I know many have posted that it's too late to fire HCTR.  But how many more efforts like this week can GMBM stand before making some change.  You clearly have enough talent to win a Cup, talent that ages every year and a window that's closing fast.  What's missing is Trotz's ability to focus that talent.

I don't buy that we are just whining because we're currently tied for 1st place in our conference.

Offline Pavel095

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 547
  • Likes: 32
Re: Coaching
« Reply #32 on: Friday March 06, 2020, 12:33:17 PM Eastern »
Definitely, in that case scenario what was the main reason to let Trotz go?
After having success with Cup winning, Rierden  with those great squad supposed to produce at least  same results as it was with Trotz..
However, in his second season as main head coach I don’t see any signs how he can improve team overall results.
For sure, if we would be lucky we can reach 1/4 of playoffs this season,but having Ovi, Backy, Kuzy, Oshie in team it supposed to be just automatically every year.



Lastly, maybe Rierden is a good assistant manager but to be main coach he doesn’t have enough skills, just compare Backy, Kuzy performance/stats couple seasons ago and you will see it’s a big difference..

Offline richkrt99

  • Oh, I'm the Hillbilly alrighty!
  • Hockey Deity
  • ******
  • Posts: 7004
  • Likes: 880
  • Bigger than yours!
Re: Coaching
« Reply #33 on: Friday March 06, 2020, 06:00:29 PM Eastern »
Well thanks to Wayne, we now have a suitable moniker for our fearless leader...Coach Rearend.


Coach Rearend is taking a lot of heat for the level of play of the players....as well he certainly should.
I think Mr. Rearend is actually probably quite a knowledgeable and decent enough coach.  He just isn't a very good head coach.  There's a huge difference in the responsibilities of the two.  The head coach really does not "coach" the players anymore but more so "manages" ALL the aspects of the team.  I think Mr. Rearend likely had a good handle on being the number 2 COACH guy, but was not prepared for the level of "managing" that is needed in all aspects of being a head coach.  And of course now he is ultimately responsible for what happens with the success (or lack there of) of the team.
He certainly did not inherit an "easy" team to manage.  Yes, a team LOADED with talent, but also a team loaded with talent that doesn't always put in the effort.  A team that HISTORICALLY has long stretches of under performing.  Let's be honest, this team has pretty much under performed EVERY YEAR of the last 15 with the exception of the Cup year and maybe one or two others where they simply got beat.
And I don't think moving from assistant coach to head coach on the same team with a bunch of the same guys really helps the case.  In fact, I think it just makes it harder.  The tenured Caps players surely had respect for him as a coach and listened to what he said.  But now he's the head cheese and they likely still see him as "a coach".  So I think it easy for them to take what he says NOW with less respect just by the nature of their previous roles.
An no disrespect to any of them, but you think Ovi really cares what some "assistant" coach says about his level of play.  He knows he's the star and the apple of Ted's eye (and the silver lining in Ted's wallet)
You need a coach that fits the organization.  And I know Mr. Rearend has fit this organization for a long time....BUT as an ASSISTANT coach.  With a team with this meany "stars" with this much talent and experience, you need a head coach with at least of the calibre of players you have.
IMO you can't have a beginner head coach couching a bunch of high caliber players....who PREVIOUSLY know you as an assistant.  It just doesn't create a fair opportunity for the head coach.
Especially when we KNOW what kind of under performing this very group is not only capable of slipping into, but historically has proven itself to do so.


Anyway, Mr. Rearend's probably not a bad guy or even a bad coach.  He just is not the right HEAD coach for this team.





FFS - HIT HIM!!!
SHOOT - THE - PUCK

Offline PUCKNRUSH

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
  • Likes: 230
Re: Coaching
« Reply #34 on: Friday March 06, 2020, 10:10:17 PM Eastern »
I second Wayne’s revamping of our HC’s name!  Seems like a keeper!
I’m just checkin’ if it was “Cut Coach Rearend loose”, OR, “Cut Coach loose Rearend”!😂🤣😂



 Interesting point too, Rich, on the difficulty associated with having many of your players, dealing with you as an assistant coach beforehand, and now having to see you as the head honcho!
Might require a little more titanium in the nut sack, than Rearend possesses, in order to get respect!


I still though, basically maintain, that the “under performing” issue, that has plagued us for eons, SHOULD BE, and THEORETICALLY,  IS the responsibility of the HC!....BUT.....It’s so deeply pervasive on our team, that NO COACH, anywhere, anytime, could ever remedy the problem!


My point being that the DISCIPLINARY measures, an HC would have to implement, necessary to TRULY break the collective will of its very foundation, amongst the ring leaders of it, would NOT ever be TOLERATED by Ownership!


Said another way, the faith in the HC, and the length of time, and patience, and LATITUDE, Ownership would have to EXTEND to an HC, (assuming he was even CAPABLE of taking the actions necessary), WOULD NEVER be acceptable to Ownership, as a PROPER way to handle the problem!


Rush

Always hopeful, yet discontent -
He knows CHANGES aren’t permanent -
              BUT CHANGE IS!!!

RUSH - from “Tom Sawyer”

Offline ArJunaZ

  • ♂ ☺n Probation!
  • Administrator
  • Hockey Deity
  • ******
  • Posts: 13978
  • Likes: 1529
  • What's Ghey Pride?
Re: Coaching
« Reply #35 on: Saturday March 07, 2020, 05:06:24 AM Eastern »

My point being that the DISCIPLINARY measures, an HC would have to implement, necessary to TRULY break the collective will of its very foundation, amongst the ring leaders of it, would NOT ever be TOLERATED by Ownership!


Said another way, the faith in the HC, and the length of time, and patience, and LATITUDE, Ownership would have to EXTEND to an HC, (assuming he was even CAPABLE of taking the actions necessary), WOULD NEVER be acceptable to Ownership, as a PROPER way to handle the problem!

Rush
Great point Rush.
I have been pondering this very thought about Reirden's limitations, whether he has a weakness or not, or is much being imposed on him by ownership.  This has been one reason I have not trashed him so much.

The problem AND the solution lie in the player's hearts and minds.  At this point in the season this is not a bad thing.  All relies on the players themselves to decide IF they want to grab this very rare opportunity and take home another cup.  I still believe this team more than any other is capable of bringing home the cup. There is more than enough experience in our players and especially the leaders to accomplish this. They know what it will take.

It is almost too late.  They will need to find the mettle to bind them very soon. Win or lose today against Pittsburgh, if they can't fire on all cylinders and avoid stupid mistakes I will call it pretty much hopeless at that point.  I think they know this.  Today will bear great meaning for the remainder of the season.

(I will now begin to digress)

This is very reminiscent of 2018.  It was the players that decided to bring home the cup.  We slumped through February that year too.   Then we went on a tear, but still had a very questionable Holtby with Grubauer holding down the fort.  Holtby found his game after the playoffs began.  The Capitals at that point were on a mission.

We are less than a handful of games separated from that successful season.

For some reason I was extremely calm and expectant of a cup win in 2018, even through the rough spots. This year I believe we have even more talent, though I miss Orpik and Niskanen for sure.  Our defensive failing this year falls largely on the forwards, yet we've seen they are capable of extremely responsible two-way play. I am not now nearly as calm about our chances as I was that year

Someone else pointed out, I think it was Alta, that a new coach this late in the season is a non-starter for many reasons.  I think Reirden has done a pretty good job as HC.  There has been many a game where we were being handled by the opponents only to come out and tilt the ice back after an intermission. I believe Reirden played a large role there.

As many have pointed out, we have many larger than life players on our team, and with that headwind and the not so secret top down edicts setting an unchangeable mold of how we handle these players we must use our intelligence to fairly place the blame where most of us have realized it belonged for years ... on the players.

The one area I would blame equally on coaching and the players is the power play.  We have seen how this team can thwart the best aggressive PK when they decide to drop the rigid PP structure and crash the net, fire everything at the net, and BE THERE for rebounds.  I am inclined to believe the coaching is to blame for this failure.

With regards to excessive penalties I expect the players are now on their own to sort this out.  Each player needs to be held accountable by the entire team for letting them down when they take a selfish penalty.

This year we've seen from the Capitals some of the most remarkable displays of confidence, skill, will, heart, and perseverance, leading to some of the most memorable comebacks and displays in NHL history.  All they need is to find a few switches and we are capable of a legitimate shot at the cup.
I honestly don't know if Trotz had answers to these same problems. I'm inclined to think not. Even he said it ultimately came from the players.

Huge game today in Pittsburgh.
Be careful what you ask for America; you just might get it.

Offline Beaglefan2

  • Advanced Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1603
  • Likes: 345
Re: Coaching
« Reply #36 on: Saturday March 07, 2020, 10:24:14 AM Eastern »

I'll go back to the PP as the best measure of coaching ability.  For the rest of the game, the coaches put in a system and players more or less try and execute it with the back and forth flow of the game.  A good coach comes up with the right system for the talents of his players but then it is up to them to stay with it and execute.


The PP may be the same way to an extent, but it is contained and you can actually plan an exact system with specific play sets for each team you play.  The Caps rarely adapt to different teams, they just do the same thing over and over.  They also never copy the system of teams that have hot PPs, they just force the puck to Ovi every time.


The second aspect of the PP that is an absolute coaching flaw is the entry. Our ridiculous drop pass approach just does not work and wastes a ton of time.  We would be much better off with quick sharp passes coming down the ice.  Even dump-ins would be better than watching Dylan casually and blindly drop back lazy passes.

KollieOlizig

  • Guest
Re: Coaching
« Reply #37 on: Saturday March 07, 2020, 10:41:34 AM Eastern »
I'll go back to the PP as the best measure of coaching ability.  For the rest of the game, the coaches put in a system and players more or less try and execute it with the back and forth flow of the game.  A good coach comes up with the right system for the talents of his players but then it is up to them to stay with it and execute.


The PP may be the same way to an extent, but it is contained and you can actually plan an exact system with specific play sets for each team you play.  The Caps rarely adapt to different teams, they just do the same thing over and over.  They also never copy the system of teams that have hot PPs, they just force the puck to Ovi every time.


The second aspect of the PP that is an absolute coaching flaw is the entry. Our ridiculous drop pass approach just does not work and wastes a ton of time.  We would be much better off with quick sharp passes coming down the ice.  Even dump-ins would be better than watching Dylan casually and blindly drop back lazy passes.
      I agree about our pp. Especially that stupid drop pass. Our pp has had some success when Wilson plays on the first unit and creates traffic in front of the net. I hope to see more of that.
      I think we should be talking about our 5 on 5 play. We have been horrendous defensively. We blame our goalies and defencemen but defense is a team concept and our forwards aren't helping enough. We have too many forwards that spent most of their time going north and not enough south.
     Ovi himself was responsible for a goal in each of the last 2 games because of lazy back checking.
Another problem has been our forwards being guilty of leaving the zone early. Too often our defence have no options so they force a stretch pass.
      There is too much gap in our game. Usually that means the east west gap between the 2 defencemen but it also means the north south gap between the forwards and defencemen.  The one goal Philly scored a couple games ago was a 4 on 2. All 3 forwards got caught deep.

Offline waynerivers

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
  • Likes: 151
Re: Coaching
« Reply #38 on: Saturday March 07, 2020, 10:50:11 AM Eastern »
      I agree about our pp. Especially that stupid drop pass. Our pp has had some success when Wilson plays on the first unit and creates traffic in front of the net. I hope to see more of that.
      I think we should be talking about our 5 on 5 play. We have been horrendous defensively. We blame our goalies and defencemen but defense is a team concept and our forwards aren't helping enough. We have too many forwards that spent most of their time going north and not enough south.
     Ovi himself was responsible for a goal in each of the last 2 games because of lazy back checking.
Another problem has been our forwards being guilty of leaving the zone early. Too often our defence have no options so they force a stretch pass.
      There is too much gap in our game. Usually that means the east west gap between the 2 defencemen but it also means the north south gap between the forwards and defencemen.  The one goal Philly scored a couple games ago was a 4 on 2. All 3 forwards got caught deep.


I agree totally on backchecking.  This team is lazy as crap, something that Trotz would not tolerate.  Remember Ovie backchecking and actually blocking shots?  Seems like a long time ago.  Nobody does much now aside from maybe the 4th line.  Kuz and Vrana are one way guys and Backstrom has looked like an 80 year old woman for about a month and a half.  I have no idea what's wrong with him.  He's stunk since he signed the extension especially.


Much of this, though not all, falls on the coach and Rierden has demonstrated he's totally incompetent.  They have a ready replacement sitting there in Alan May, who quickly figures out what's wrong and wouldn't put up with this type of play.  He'd be cheap enough, too, which should make Leonsis happy.  That's step one of a multi-step process because changes need to be made on the roster as well and that means that nobody outside Ovechkin should be untouchable.  Yes, that means you Kuz, Carlson, Orlov, etc, etc.

Offline waynerivers

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
  • Likes: 151
Re: Coaching
« Reply #39 on: Saturday March 07, 2020, 10:53:45 AM Eastern »
I'll go back to the PP as the best measure of coaching ability.  For the rest of the game, the coaches put in a system and players more or less try and execute it with the back and forth flow of the game.  A good coach comes up with the right system for the talents of his players but then it is up to them to stay with it and execute.


The PP may be the same way to an extent, but it is contained and you can actually plan an exact system with specific play sets for each team you play.  The Caps rarely adapt to different teams, they just do the same thing over and over.  They also never copy the system of teams that have hot PPs, they just force the puck to Ovi every time.


 

The second aspect of the PP that is an absolute coaching flaw is the entry. Our ridiculous drop pass approach just does not work and wastes a ton of time.  We would be much better off with quick sharp passes coming down the ice.  Even dump-ins would be better than watching Dylan casually and blindly drop back lazy passes.


The "slingshot" is the dumbest thing ever invented and needs to go. 
The "slingshot" is the dumbest thing ever invented.  What the hell use is getting to the red line practically, maybe getting around a guy and then throwing it backwards so that the next guy has to do the same work again?  The whole thing is utterly stupid and, as you said, wastes time.
ou said, wastes time.