0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Another 714 goal. maybe that's why he's not invited to the All-Star game.
how to beat the Caps 101 . . .
http://www.hockeycentral.co.uk/nhlrules/Rules-10.phpThe penalty should have been a bench minor on Ovie, not an unsportsmanlike penalty on Connolly. The refs got it wrong.
Quote from: ArJunaZ on Thursday January 11, 2018, 08:12:40 PM Easternhttp://www.hockeycentral.co.uk/nhlrules/Rules-10.phpThe penalty should have been a bench minor on Ovie, not an unsportsmanlike penalty on Connolly. The refs got it wrong. BTW Connolly did not get the penalty. It was a bench minor. Someone that was on the ice has to serve the penalty.
Quote from: Maacoshark on Thursday January 11, 2018, 08:32:17 PM EasternQuote from: ArJunaZ on Thursday January 11, 2018, 08:12:40 PM Easternhttp://www.hockeycentral.co.uk/nhlrules/Rules-10.phpThe penalty should have been a bench minor on Ovie, not an unsportsmanlike penalty on Connolly. The refs got it wrong. BTW Connolly did not get the penalty. It was a bench minor. Someone that was on the ice has to serve the penalty.They corrected it (what's new?). It was originally reported on the box score as unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Connolly.
Quote from: ArJunaZ on Thursday January 11, 2018, 08:37:58 PM EasternThey corrected it (what's new?). It was originally reported on the box score as unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Connolly. That call was a no brainer. I can't believe Ovi didnt know he couldn't do that.
They corrected it (what's new?). It was originally reported on the box score as unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Connolly.
and I heard about six announcers that were dumbfounded by the call, on t v and radio. No one had even heard of it being called much less witnessing it. The zebras could've easily called too many men and it wouldn't have been questioned
Quote from: altajava on Thursday January 11, 2018, 08:47:58 PM Easternand I heard about six announcers that were dumbfounded by the call, on t v and radio. No one had even heard of it being called much less witnessing it. The zebras could've easily called too many men and it wouldn't have been questioned NHL Rule Book10.3Broken Stick - Player - A broken stick is one which, in the opinion of the Referee, is unfit for normal play. A player without a stick may participate in the game. A player whose stick is broken may participate in the game provided he drops the broken stick. A minor penalty shall be imposed for an infraction of this rule. A player who has lost or broken his stick may only receive a stick at his own players' bench or be handed one from a teammate on the ice. A player may not participate in the play using a goalkeeper's stick. A minor penalty shall be imposed for an infraction of this rule. A player tendered a stick thrown on the ice from the players' or penalty bench will not receive a penalty. However, the person responsible for throwing the stick will receive a bench minor penalty.It's pretty clear to me.
